Acta academica karviniensia 2014, 14(2):22-34 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2014.025

Klíčový rozvoj, aplikace kontextu a formy hodnocení technologií

Marek Jemala
University of Nova Gorica, School of Engineering and Management, Vipavska 13, Rožna Dolina, Nova Gorica, Slovenia, SI-5000, E-mail:marek.jemala@ung.si

The key intention of this study is to outline primary characteristics, the application context and the forms of Technology Assessment (TA). Identifying determinants and effects of a new technology usually requires an interdisciplinary approach. The final "technology picture" should be based on a broader rational consensus of the scientific discussion, but TA can also require the participation of non-experts who can bring a more comprehensive insight into the process. This study also deals with the historical characterization of TA within technology identification processes, as a part of integrated Technology management. The research was carried out based on an intensive literature study, the extensive Bibliometrical analysis especially of the Sciencedirect and the EBSCOhost databases, and several case studies.

Klíčová slova: foresight, technology assessment, technology forecasting, technology innovation, technological literacy
JEL classification: O14, O32, O33

Vloženo: 15. únor 2013; Přijato: 16. červen 2014; Zveřejněno: 30. červen 2014  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jemala M. Klíčový rozvoj, aplikace kontextu a formy hodnocení technologií. Acta academica karviniensia. 2014;14(2):22-34. doi: 10.25142/aak.2014.025.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. CAGNIN, C., M. KEENAN, R. JOHNSTON, F. SCAPOLO and R. BARRÉ, 2008. Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Strategic Intelligence for an Innovative Economy. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN 3642088368. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. COVALLA, E. et al., 2001. Managing Agricultural Water Impacts. North Carolina State University [online]. [accessed May 5, 2011]. Available on: http://wingolog.org/writings/water/water.pdf
    3. DADDARIO, E. Q., 1975. Annual Report to the Congress by the Office of Technology Assessment: March 15, 1975. The Office of Technology Assessment [online]. [accessed May 14, 2011]. Available on: http://www.fas.org/ota/reports/7500.pdf
    4. DECKER, M. and M. LADIKAS, 2004. Bridges between Science, Society and Policy: Technology Assessment - Methods and Impacts. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3540212833. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. DESEL, J. and G. JUHÁS, 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. ISBN 3-540-42662-0.
    6. DIENEL, P. C., 2002. Die Planungszelle. Der Bürger als Chance. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. ISBN 3531330284. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. EBSCOHOST, 2011. Research Database. EBSCOHOST [online]. [accessed March 22, 2011]. Available on: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/search?vid=2&hid=5&sid=3bcae00f-4fa3-4c9b-9622-7f89daed5d59%40sessionmgr14
    8. EBSCOHOST, 2013. Research Database. EBSCOHOST [online]. [accessed February 13, 2013]. Available on: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/search/advanced?sid=84c1d281-4be3-41ae-8f2a-17a8cf0a5dda%40sessionmgr110&vid=29&hid=108
    9. EFMN, 2010. Database of Foresight initiatives. EFMN [online]. [accessed January 10, 2010]. Available on: http://www.foresight-network.eu/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=56
    10. GENUS, A. and A. M. COLES, 2005. On constructive technology assessment and limitations on public participation in technology assessment. Technology analysis and strategic management, 17(4), 433-443. ISSN 0953-7325. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. GRUNWALD, A., 2006. Science independence as a constitutive part of parliamentary technology assessment. Science and public policy, 33(2), 103-11., ISSN 1471-5430. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. GUSTON, D. H. and D. SAREWITZ, 2002. Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24(1-2), 93-109. ISSN 0160-791X. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. HANSEN, J., 2006. Operationalising the public in participatory technology assessment: A framework for comparison applied to free cases. Science and public policy, 33(8), 571-584. ISSN 1471-5430. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. JEMALA, M. and F. SVATÝ, 2010. Ontológia foresightu: Podnety pre tvorbu vízie SR na báze metodiky foresightu. Bratislava: Ekonóm. ISBN 802252879X.
    15. JEMALA, Ľ., 2008. Podnikateľský manažment a marketing. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo STU. ISBN 8022728607.
    16. JOLY, P. B. and A. RIP, 2007. A timely harvest. Nature, 450(8), 1-11. ISSN 0028-0836. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. KRÜCK, C. P., N. MALANOWSKI and A. ZWECK, 2003. Technology assessment and business community: Trends and innovative developments in western countries. Futures Research Quarterly, 19(3), 45-52. ISSN 8755-3317.
    18. LEMAIRE, O., A. MONEYRON and J. E. MASSON, 2011. "Interactive Technology Assessment" and Beyond: the Field Trial of Genetically Modified Grapevines at INRA-Colmar. PLOS Biology [online]. [accessed June 14, 2011]. Available on: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1000551
    19. LADIKAS, M. and M. DECKER, 2004. Assessing the Impact of Future-Oriented Technology. Institute for Technology Assessment and System Analysis [online]. [accessed July 1, 2011]. Available on: http://foresight.jrc.ec.europa.eu/fta/papers/Session%204%20What%27s%20the%20Use/Assessing%20the%20Impact%20of%20Future-Oriented%20Technology.pdf
    20. LOVERIDGE, D., 2009. Foresight: The Art and Science of Anticipating the Future. NY: Routledge. ISBN 0415398150. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. LUDWIG, B., 1998. Fuzzy logic applications in technology assessment studies. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 1(6), 375-388. ISSN 1064-1246.
    22. MARRIS, C., P. JOLY and A. BERTRAND, 2006. Choosing participants for a constructive technology assessment exercise: dilemmas and consequences. In: Proceedings of the PATH Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, 4-7 June 2006.
    23. MORET-HARTMAN, M., 2008. Problem structuring in health technology assessment. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen [online]. [accessed July 1, 2011]. Available on: http://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/2066/65603/1/65603_probstinh.pdf
    24. NASA, 2011. Technology assessment. NASA [online]. [accessed June 29, 2011]. Available on: www.nasa.gov/pdf/140640main_ESAS_09.pdf
    25. OWEN, R. and N. GOLDBERG, 2010. Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Analysis, 30(11), 1699-1707. ISSN 1539-6924. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. PESARAN, H. M. and M. WICKENS, 1999: Handbook of Applied Econometrics: Macroeconomics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 0631215581. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. REUZEL, R. P. B., G. J. VAN DER WILT, H. A. M. J. TEN HAVE and P. F. DE VRIES ROBBÉ, 2001. Interactive Technology Assessment and Wide Reflective Equilibrium. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 26(3), 245-261. ISSN 1744-5019. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. RIP, A., 2005. Technology Assessment as Part of the Co-Evolution of Nanotechnology and Society: the Thrust of the TA Program in NanoNed. In: Proceedings of the Nanotechnology in Science, Economy and Society, Marburg, 13-15 January 2005.
    29. SCHEVITZ, J., 1993. OTA at 20: On the starting block. TA- Datenbank-Nachrichten. 22(3), 3-14. ISSN 0943-8246. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    30. SCIENCEDIRECT, 2012. Research Database. SCIENCEDIRECT [online]. [accessed June 15, 2012]. Available on: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MiamiSearchURL&_method=requestForm&_btn=Y&_zone=TopNavBar&_origin=browse&_acct=C000051056&_version=1&_urlVersion=1&_userid=1052399&md5=107b8dcb923b70ac4addc80473615754.
    31. SCIENCEDIRECT, 2013. Research Database. SCIENCEDIRECT [online]. [accessed February 13, 2013]. Available on: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MiamiSearchURL&_method=requestForm&_btn=Y&_zone=TopNavBar&_origin=srch_form&_acct=C000051056&_version=1&_urlVersion=1&_userid=1052399&md5=6df163298987bcdd17ed6eb33b5385a0
    32. TASSEY, G., 2009. The Roles and Economic Impacts of Technology Infrastructure. NIST [online]. [accessed November 13, 2009]. Available on: www.nist.gov/.../Measurement_Infrastr_Roles_Impacts_v3.pdf
    33. VASANTHI, N. and N. CH. SHEKHAR, 2004. Technology innovations and its social impacts. In: Proceedings of the IAMOT conference, Washington D.C., September 2004.
    34. VDI, 1991. Technikbewertung - Begriffe Und Grundlagen. In Die Vdi Richtlinie 3780. Institut für Philosophie [online]. [Accessed April 4, 2010]. Available on: www.Philosophie.Uni-Karlsruhe.De/.../488_Maring_Lse_1505_2008.pdf
    35. WAINE, T., 2007. Fuzzy Logic. St Albans: Camra Books. ISBN 1852492325.

    Zpět na obsah