Acta academica karviniensia 2016, 16(4):23-31 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2016.029

JUDICIAL PRACTICES IN SELECTED STATES IN CASES OF LEGAL LIABILITY OF AUCTION PORTALS FOR COUNTERFEIT GOODS

Tomáš Gongol
Slezská univerzita, Obchodně podnikatelská fakulta, Univerzitní nám. 1934/3,73340 Karviná, Email:gongol@opf.slu.cz

The problem with verification of origin of goods in the online environment has resulted in an increase of the sale of counterfeit goods and general abuse of Trademarks. The following article deals with the question of legal liability of Internet auction portals, which have become a distribution and sales point of counterfeit goods. With regard to the topic of the article, which falls within the scope of the rarely codified are of the operation of law on the Internet there are particularly compared approaches both European and North American judicial practice. Courts on the both continents have repeatedly solved the problems of Internet portals as information society service providers. The subject of particular interest is globally active auction site eBay, which has been the subject of many disputes worldwide.

Keywords: counterfeit goods, internet regulation, online auction, Trademark
JEL classification: K24

Received: October 28, 2016; Accepted: November 30, 2016; Published: December 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gongol T. JUDICIAL PRACTICES IN SELECTED STATES IN CASES OF LEGAL LIABILITY OF AUCTION PORTALS FOR COUNTERFEIT GOODS. Acta academica karviniensia. 2016;16(4):23-31. doi: 10.25142/aak.2016.029.
Download citation

References

  1. ABEL, A., 1990. Asset Prices Under Habit Formation and Catching Up With the Jones. American Ec onomic Review, 80(2), s. 38-42. Go to original source...
  2. CARROLL, B. A. and A. C. AHUVIA, 2006. Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17(2), s. 79-89 [vid. 2016-10-25]. Dostupné z: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-006-4219-2. Go to original source...
  3. GROVER, V. and P. RAMANLAL, 2004. Digital economics and the e-business dilemma. Business Horizons, 47(4), s. 71-80 [vid. 2016-10-25]. Dostupné z: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0007681304000503. Go to original source...
  4. JENNINGS, J. S., 1989. Trademark Counterfeiting: an unpublished crime. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 80(3), s. 805-841. Go to original source...
  5. OTIM, S. and V. GROVER, 2010. E-commerce: a brand name's curse. Electronic Markets, 20(2), s. 147-160 [vid. 2016-10-25]. Dostupné z: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-010-0039-6. Go to original source...
  6. SAUNDERS, K. and G. BERGER-WALLISER, 2011. The Liability of Online Markets for Counterfeit Goods: A Comparative Analysis of Secondary Trademark Infringement in the United States and Europe. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 32(1), s. 37-91.
  7. VETTER, W. and C. J. HILL, 2006. Marketing and the law: the hunt fo onlinetrademark infringers: the internet, gray markets, and law collide. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), s. 87-88. Go to original source...