Acta academica karviniensia 2020, 20(1):31-46 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2020.003

Způsoby hodnocení mezinárodních rizik na pojišťovacím trhu

Michaela Petrová, Martina Krügerová, Michal Kozieł
VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics, Sokolská třída 33, 701 21 Ostrava

Today, insurance companies are looking for new approaches to risk insurance so that the risk remains insurable and at the same time does not endanger the existence of the insurance company itself. Every risk must be evaluated by the insurance company as best as possible. Insurance companies have their own methodologies for assessing international risks, which show differences. Each insurance company tries to ascertain the most accurate quantitative and qualitative data in order to analyse the potential risk in depth. Evaluation is the basis for setting prices, country risk limits and, if necessary, has an impact on the specific definition of risk acceptance conditions. The aim of the article is to analyse and evaluate the methods and approaches of insurance companies on the basis of data obtained from databases of OECD and selected credit insurance companies. Further assess from the perspective of the exporter whether these methods are important in his deciding during the implementation of a specific business case. The result is the finding that the risk evaluations of insurance companies are beneficial for the exporter in terms of assessing the planned intention to export to the territory.

Klíčová slova: export, insurance market, international risk.
JEL classification: F13, F36, F53, K33

Vloženo: 5. říjen 2020; Revidováno: 2. prosinec 2020; Přijato: 16. prosinec 2020; Zveřejněno: 17. prosinec 2020  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Petrová M, Krügerová M, Kozieł M. Způsoby hodnocení mezinárodních rizik na pojišťovacím trhu. Acta academica karviniensia. 2020;20(1):31-46. doi: 10.25142/aak.2020.003.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. ASIRI, B. and R. A. HUBAIL, 2014. An Empirical Analysis of Country Risk Ratings. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly. 5 (4), 52-67. ISSN 2152-1034.
  2. ATRADIUS, 2020. Mapa rizik [online]. [cit. 15th September 2020]. Accessible from: https://atradius.cz/clanek/mapa-rizik.html#.
  3. ATRADIUS, 2015. The STAR rating - Background information [online]. [cit. 15th September 2020]. Accessible from: https://atradius.cz/clanek/mapa-rizik.html#.
  4. AU GROUP, 2020. Credit Insurance Market Survey [online]. [cit. 1st September 2020]. Accessible from: https://tcisigorta.com/media/0hloxo2c/credit-insurance-market-2020-au-group.pdf.
  5. BAR-NIV, Ran and D. L. BICKELHAUPT, 1986. Research in International Risk and Insurance: Summary, Synthesis, and Prospects. Journal of Risk and Insurance [online]. 53(1), 119-134 [cit. 4th July 2020]. ISSN 0022-4367. Accessible from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/252270. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. BERNE UNION, 2020. Export Credit & Investment Insurance Industry Report 2019. Annual report of the export credit and investment insurance business of Berne Union Members [online]. [cit. 15th September 2020]. Accessible from: https://bublob.blob.core.windows.net/assets/Images/Berne%20Union%202019%20Industry%20Report.pdf.
  7. BÖHM, A a F. JANATKA, 2004. Pojištění úvěrových rizik v mezinárodním obchodě. Praha: Grada Publishing, a.s. ISBN 80-247-0816-7.
  8. CREDENDO, 2020. CREDENDO's Country Risk Assessment [online]. [cit. 17th July 2020]. Accessible from: https://www.credendo.com/rating-explanation.
  9. COFACE, 2020a. Economic Studies and Country Risks [online]. [cit. 17th July 2020]. Accessible from: https://www.coface.com/Economic-Studies-and-Country-Risks.
  10. COFACE, 2020b. Coface introduces CRAFT, a new forecasting tool to estimate growth in the Eurozone [online]. [cit. 20th August 2020]. Accessible from: https://www.cofacecentraleurope.com/content/download/177226/2919864/file/Panorama+Europe.pdf.
  11. COFACE, 2020c. Press release 31.3.2020 [online]. [cit. 17th July 2020]. Accessible from: http://www.coface.cz/Novinky-Publikace/Novinky/Pojistovna-COFACE-dava-ceskym-firmam-postizenym-dopady-pandemie-k-dispozici-zdarma-unikatni-obchodni-informace.
  12. COFACE, 2020d. Coface Risk Monitor [online]. [cit. 17th July 2020]. Accessible from: http://www.coface.cz/Sluzby-klientum/Kreditni-informace/Coface-Risk-Monitor.
  13. COFACE, 2020e. InfoIcon [online]. [cit. 17th July 2020]. Accessible from: https://icon.cofacecentraleurope.com/web/online/products/creditreportandmonitoring?19&country=AT⟨uage=cs&pageId=28.
  14. COFACE, 2020f. Barometer. Country and sector risks barometer, Q2 2020. Coface Economic Research Team. 8 Juene 2020 [online]. [cit. 17th July 2020]. Accessible from: www.coface.com/Economic-Studies-and-Country-Risks.
  15. EGAP, 2020. Mapa rizik EGAP [online]. [cit. 20th August 2020]. Accessible from: https://www.egap.cz/.
  16. EULER HERMES, 2020a. Mapa rizika podle zemí. Jak se hodnotí riziko země? [online]. [cit. 30th August 2020]. Available from: https://www.eulerhermes.com/cs_CZ/ekonomicke-pruzkumy/mapy-rizika.html.
  17. EULER HERMES, 2020b. Sector risk methodology [online]. [cit. 30th August 2020]. Accessible from: https://www.eulerhermes.com/content/dam/onemarketing/ehndbx/eulerhermes_com/cee/pdf/sector-risk-methodology-euler-hermes.pdf.
  18. GLOVA, J., W. BERNATÍK and D. DANCAKOVA, 2019. Assessment of Changes in Country Risk Clustering of the EU Countries. AD ALTA-Journal of Interdisciplinary Research [online]. 9(2), 47-53 [cit. 1st November 2020]. Accessible from: http://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/0902/papers/A_glova.pdf.
  19. HOTI, S., 2003. The International Country Risk Guide: An Empirical Evaluation [online]. [cit. 30th August 2020]. Accessible from: http://www.mssanz.org.au/MODSIM03/Volume_03/B09/04_Hoti_International.pdf.
  20. LEE, Ch.-Ch., Y.-B. CHIU and Ch.-H. CHANG, 2013. Insurance demand and country risks: A nonlinear panel data analysis. Journal of International Money and Finance [online]. 36(C), 68-85 [cit. 20th August 2020]. ISSN 0261-5606. Accessible from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.03.009. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  21. MCALEER, M. and S. HOTI, 2004. An Empirical Assessment of Country Risk Ratings and Associated Models. Journal of Economic Surveys [online]. 18(4), 539-588 [cit. 30th August 2020]. ISSN 0950-0804. Accessible from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0950-0804.2004.00230.x. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  22. MORTANGES, CH. P. and ALLERS, 1996. Political risk assessment: Theory and the experience of Dutch firms. International Business Review [online]. 5(3), 303-318, [cit. 30th October 2020]. ISSN 0969-5931. Accessible from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-5931(96)00012-1. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  23. OECD, 2020a. Country risk classification [online]. [cit. 15th July 2020]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/trade/topics/export-credits/arrangement-and-sector-understandings/financing-terms-and-conditions/country-risk-classification/.
  24. OECD, 2017. Operational Procedures for the Country Risk Experts Group - December 2017 Revision [online]. [cit. 15th July 2020]. Accessible from: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=TAD/PG(2017)11/FINAL&docLanguage=En.
  25. PETROVÁ, M., 2020. Insurable and Uninsurable Risks and their Classification from the Perspective of a Czech Exporter. In: BRANŽOVSKÝ, J. and J. PAVELEK eds. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference MEKON 2020. Ostrava: VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, pp. 154-161. ISBN 978-80-248-4410-7.
  26. POLÁK, J., M. BERANOVÁ and J. TABAS, 2011. Conception of risk in the international trade. In: The International Scientific Conference INPROFORUM 2011. České Budějovice: University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Economics. pp 340 - 347. ISBN 978-80-7394-315-8.
  27. PRS GROUP, 2020. The International Country Risk Guide (ICRG) [online]. [cit. 15th July 2020]. Accessible from: https://www.prsgroup.com/explore-our-products/international-country-risk-guide/.