Acta academica karviniensia 2024, 24(1):29-42 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2024.003

Vliv přímých zahraničních investic na hospodářský růst v Turecku: přístup ARDL

Mehman Karimov1, Emilia Huseynova2
1 Azerbaijan Technological University, Azerbaijan State Agricultural University, AZ2000 Ganja, Azerbaijan
2 Mingachevir State University, AZ4500, Mingachevir, Azerbaijan

This paper investigates the impact of Foreign Direct Investment inflows on economic growth in Türkiye. The study covers the period from 2006 Q2 to 2019 Q4. Time series datasets obtained from the CBT and FRED database are used for statistical analyses, including ADF, PP, Zivot Andrews Unit Root Tests, the ARDL bounds testing approach, and the Granger Causality tests, to fulfil the empirical part of the study. Based on the obtained findings, it was confirmed that, Foreign Direct Investment inflows have a positive impact on economic growth in Türkiye. Moreover, the results of the Granger causality analysis reveal a bidirectional relationship between FDI and GDP.

Klíčová slova: ARDL bounds testing approach and Granger causality test, FDI, GDP, Türkiye, Unit root tests.
JEL classification: B22, B27, C12, F21

Vloženo: 26. duben 2024; Revidováno: 9. květen 2024; Přijato: 24. červen 2024; Zveřejněno: 28. červen 2024  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Karimov M, Huseynova E. Vliv přímých zahraničních investic na hospodářský růst v Turecku: přístup ARDL. Acta academica karviniensia. 2024;24(1):29-42. doi: 10.25142/aak.2024.003.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. BAIASHVILI, T. and L. GATTINI, 2020. Impact of FDI on economic growth: The role of country income levels and institutional strength. EIB Working Papers.
    2. BELKANIA, D. and M. KARIMOV, 2018. An Empirical Examination of the Export-Led Growth Theory Regarding Georgia. European Journal of Marketing and Economics, 1(3). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3456936 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. CALAL, M. H., K. M. ILHAM, N. E. VAQIF, Z. E. CALAL and T. G. Mardan, 2023. The role of the Foreign Direct Investment inflows on export in Azerbaijan: An ARDL approach. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 160-172. https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEP/article/view/28259 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    4. CHAKRABORTY, C. and P. NUNNENKAMP, 2008. Economic reforms, FDI, and economic growth in India: A sector level analysis. World development, 36(7), 1192-1212. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. DAR, A. A., H. M. A. BHATTI and T. MUHAMMAD, 2016. FDI and Economic Growth in Pakistan: A Sector Wise Multivariate Cointegration Analysis. The Pakistan Development Review, 67-88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44986476
    6. DICKEY, D. and W. A. FULLER, 1979. Distribution of the estimators for time series regressions with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. GÁL, Z. and A. GYIMESI, 2021. Does foreign investment generate regional economic growth in emerging countries and their regions? Case of Central & Eastern Europe and Hungary. 13th World Congress of the RSAI: Smart Regions: Opportunities for sustainable development in the digital era. Ponte Delgada Azores, 2021 május 25-28.
    8. IRANMANESH, N. and S. A. JALAEE, 2021. Testing the long-run neutrality and superneutrality of money in a developing country: Evidence from Iran. MethodsX, 8, 101251. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    9. KARIMOV, M., 2019. The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Trade (Export and Import) in Türkiye. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 6-17. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    10. KARIMOV, M., 2020. An empirical analysis of the relationship among foreign direct investment, gross domestic product, CO2 emissions, renewable energy contribution in the context of the Environmental Kuznets Curve and pollution haven hypothesis regarding Türkiye. European Journal of Formal Sciences and Engineering, 3(2), 23-42. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. KARIMOV, M. and D. BELKANIA, 2018. A Case Study of Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth Relationship in Türkiye. European Journal of Marketing and Economics, 1(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejme.v1i3.p97-101 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. KARIMOV, M., E. NESIROV and E. ZEYNALLI, 2023. The Examination of the Relationship Between Foreign Direct Investment and Trade in Türkiye: ARDL Approach. Studia Universitatis "Vasile Goldis" Arad-Economics Series, 33(4), 117-144. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1176677 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. KARIMOV, M., A. PARADI-DOLGOS and R. KOROSECZNE PAVLIN, 2020. An empirical analysis of the relationship between foreign direct investment and unemployment rate: Evidence from Türkiye. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. KISSWANI, K. M., A. KEIN and S. T. SHETTY, 2015. The impact of FDI inflows on real GDP in Estonia: Evidence from a cointegration approach and causality test. The Journal of Developing Areas, 25-40. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    15. LUCAS, R. E., 1998. On the mechanics of economic development. Econometric Society Monographs, 29, 61-70. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. NISTOR, P., 2014. FDI and economic growth, the case of Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 577-582. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. PESARAN, M. H. and Y. SHIN, 1995. An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis.
    18. PESARAN, M. H., Y. SHIN and R. J. SMITH, 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. PESARAN, M. H. and R. P. SMITH, 1998. Structural analysis of cointegrating VARs. Journal of economic surveys, 12(5), 471-505. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    20. PHILLIPS, P. C. and P. PERRON, 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. RAMSEY, F. P., 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. The economic journal, 38(152), 543-559. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    22. ROMER, P. M., 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of political economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    23. ROMER, P. M., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    24. SILAJDZIC, S. and E. MEHIC, 2015. Knowledge Spillovers, Absorptive Capacities and the Impact of FDI on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Transition Economies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 614-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.142 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. SOLOW, R. M., 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. TFDİS, 2021. Türkiye's Foreign Direct Investment Strategy (2021-2023). https://www.invest.gov.tr/en/pages/Türkiye-fdi-strategy.aspx
    27. ZIVOT, E. and D. Andrews, 1992. Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/besjnlbes/v_3a10_3ay_3a1992_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a251-70.htm Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

    Zpět na obsah