Z32 - Tourism and DevelopmentNávrat zpět

Výsledky 1 až 5 z 5:

Impacts of Overtourism on the Protected Natural Area Jeseníky (PLA) in the Moravian-Silesian Region

Hanne-Lore Bobáková, Janusz Karpeta, Pavlína Pellešová

Acta academica karviniensia 2025, 25(1):18-32 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2025.002

Inovatívna synergia: úspešná spolupráca podnikov v hotelovom priemysle

Jozef Gáll

Acta academica karviniensia 2024, 24(1):18-28 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2024.002

Kulturní rozdíly jako klíčový determinant vnímání loajality turistů

Andrea Králiková, Kateřina Ryglová

Acta academica karviniensia 2021, 21(2):36-53 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2021.011

Genderové rozdíly ve vnímání kvality venkovské destinace cestovního ruchu

Astrida Peruthová, Kateřina Ryglová

Acta academica karviniensia 2018, 18(1):59-67 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2018.006

The goal of this paper is to find differencies between men and women perception quality in rural tourits'destinations in the Czech Republic. Respondents were residents from the Czech Republic. Data was collected by paper and electronic questionaire in 2016. Number of respondents was 660 - 330 men and 330 women. Kruskal - Wallis test was uesd for evaluation data. 23 factors of destination quality were evaluated. The most important factor was sence of security, cleanliness of the destination and natural attractivities for both genders. The perception of the 10 quality factors were gender-specific. This research can help in creating a destination marketing communications.

Faktory kvality destinace z pohledu poskytovatelů služeb

Šárka Stojarová, Kateřina Ryglová, Ida Rašovská, Andrea Králíková

Acta academica karviniensia 2017, 17(3):70-82 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2017.023

The article is focused on the issue of the perception of the destination quality. Primary research has been concerned with the evaluation of individual quality factors by service providers distributed by sectors in tourism industry. According to the service providers, the most significant factors of destination quality are the sense of security, the quality of staff in tourism services, and natural attractions. On the other hand, the least important factor for the service providers was local transportation followed by additional infrastructure. Factors were rated depending on the type of service provider, the overall quality of the destination, and the destination management activity in the destination. The dependence of the assessment of the destination quality factors on the type of provider was demonstrated in 13 factors, the overall quality assessment of the destination for 10 factors and the destination management activities in the given destination for 6 factors out of a total of 19 factors examined. It is also pointed to differences in perceptions between service providers and visitors. The authors also refer to the dependence of the significance of the destination quality factors on the predominant form of tourism. The recommendations for providers and organizations of destination management are suggested.