Acta academica karviniensia 2022, 22(1):5-21 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2022.001

Jaká kognitivní zkreslení nejvíce útočí na potenciální zákazníky v uživatelských recenzích?

Radka Bauerová, Tereza Ikášová, Veronika Kopřivová, Tomáš Pražák, Michal Stoklasa
Silesian University, School of Business Administration, Univerzitní nám. 1934/3, 733 40 Karviná

Reading reviews is a common activity for many potential customers when deciding to buy a product from a particular retailer. It is such a common activity that many of them may be unaware that they are influenced not only by the content of the review itself, but also by its style, display, length, and distinctiveness, with a particular cognitive bias behind each of these elements. This has an impact on their decision-making, which may ultimately be illogical. In reality, however, we are affected by hundreds of confirmed distortions that force us to think and act irrationally. If people are not always able to make rational decisions, then many of the economic assumptions need to be reviewed. The aim of this paper is therefore to uncover the cognitive biases that attack potential customers in user reviews and to determine their influence on e-shop popularity ratings. In order to accomplish the objective, a survey was conducted among the TOP 100 e-shops on the Czech market, from which were selected 70 e-shops to identify the most frequently occurring cognitive biases. In the first step, the heuristic method of observing e-shop websites was used. In the second step, a chi-square two-sample test was used to obtain results due to the nominal nature of the data under study. It was found that in terms of the user interface, the most emerging biases are bandwagon effect, apophenia, authority bias and social proof. Then, in the case of examining the reviews themselves, it was found that availability bias, story bias, processing difficulty effect, negativity effect and authority bias were determined to be the most likely to influence potential customers. Some of these biases were also found to affect the popularity ratings of the e-shop, which marketing managers should pay attention to because of the link between popularity and loyalty.

Klíčová slova: apophenia, authority bias, bandwagon effect, e-shops, negativity effect, online reviews, processing difficulty effect, story bias.
JEL classification: C12, M30, M31

Vloženo: 19. listopad 2021; Revidováno: 19. leden 2022; Přijato: 18. květen 2022; Zveřejněno: 25. květen 2022  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bauerová R, Ikášová T, Kopřivová V, Pražák T, Stoklasa M. Jaká kognitivní zkreslení nejvíce útočí na potenciální zákazníky v uživatelských recenzích? Acta academica karviniensia. 2022;22(1):5-21. doi: 10.25142/aak.2022.001.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. BASUROY, S., S. CHATTERJEE and S. A. RAVID, 2003. How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 103-117. ISSN 0022-2429. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. BOHANNON, J., 2013. Why You Shouldn't Trust Internet Comments. Science, 342(6154), 60-65. ISSN 0036-8075. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. BREUGELMANS, E., C. F. KÖHLER, B. G. C. DELLAERT and K. de RUYTER, 2012. Promoting interactive decision aids on retail websites: a message framing perspective with new vs. traditional consumer actions. Journal of Retailing, 88(2), 226-235. ISSN 0022-4359. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. CUI, G., H. K. LUI and X. GUO, 2012. The Effect of Online Consumer Reviews on New Product Sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(1), 39-58. ISSN 1557-9301 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  5. DAVIDSSON, M., 2012. Economic Growth and Risk Aversion. European Journal of Social Sciences [online]. 28(1), 92-100 [cit. 3rd August 2012]. ISSN 1450-2267. Accessible from: http://www.europeanjournalofsocialsciences.com/ISSUES//EJSS_28_1_10.pdf
  6. DEL VICARIO, M., A. SCALA, G. CALDARELLI, H. E. STANLEY and W. QUATTROCIOCCHI, 2017. Modeling confirmation bias and polarization. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-9. ISSN 2045-2322. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  7. DIMARA, E., P. DRAGICEVIC and A. BEZERIANOS, 2016. Accounting for Availability Biases in Information Visualization. ArXiv, ISSN 2331-8422.
  8. DLOUHÝ, M., 2012. Efficiency and ressource allocation within a hiearrarchical organization. In: J. RAMÍK and D. STAVÁREK, eds. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference Mathematical Methods in Economics. Karviná: Silesian University in Opava, pp.112-116. ISBN 978-80-7248-779-0.
  9. EAST, R., M. D. UNCLES, J. ROMANIUK and W. LOMAX, 2016. Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth: A reappraisal. Australasian Marketing Journal, 24(1), 54-58. ISSN 1441-3582. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  10. FICO, F., J. D. RICHARDSON and S. M. EDWARDS, 2004. Influence of Story Structure on Perceived Story Bias and News Organization Credibility. Mass Communication and Society, 7(3), 301-318. ISSN 1520-5436. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  11. GARCIA, D. and F. SCHWEITZER, 2011. Emotions in Product Reviews-Empirics and Models, IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing. Piscataway, pp. 483-488. ISBN 9781457719318. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. HASELTON, M. G., D. NETTLE and P. W. ANDREWS, 2015. The Evolution of Cognitive Bias. In: D. M. BUSS, ed. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, p. 724-746. ISBN 9780471264033. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  13. HE, J., X. WANG, M. B. VANDENBOSCH and B. R. NAULT, 2020. Revealed preference in online reviews: Purchase verification in the tablet market. Decision Support Systems, 132, 113281. ISSN 0167-9236 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  14. HILVERDA, F., M. KUTTSCHREUTER and E. GIEBELS, 2018. The Effect of Online Social Proof Regarding Organic Food: Comments and Likes on Facebook. Frontiers in Communication, 3, 1-15. ISSN 2297-900X. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. HOUDEK, P., P. KOBLOVSKÝ, D. ŠŤASTNÝ and M. VRANKA, 2018. Consumer Decision Making in the Information Age. Society, 55(5), 422-429. ISSN 0147-2011. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  16. HSIEH, J. K. and Y. J. LI, 2020. Will You Ever Trust the Review Website Again? The Importance of Source Credibility. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24(2), 255-275. ISSN 1557-9301. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  17. CHEE, Q. W. and W. D. GOH, 2018. What explains the von Restorffeffect? Contrasting distinctive processing and retrieval cue efficacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 99, 49-61. ISSN 0749-596X. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  18. CHEN, Z. and N. H. LURIE, 2013. Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 463-476. ISSN 0022-2437. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  19. CHEVALIER, J. A. and D. MAYZLIN, 2006. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354. ISSN 0022-2437. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  20. IYENGAR, S., 2010. The Art of Choosing. New York: Twelve. ISBN 978-0446504119. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  21. JOHNSON, D. D. P., D. T. BLUMSTEIN, J. H. FOWLER and M. G. HASELTON, 2013. The evolution of error: Error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 474-481. ISSN 01695347. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  22. JOHNSON, O., 2010. An Evaluation of the Competitiveness of the Czech Economy.
  23. In: P. JAMES, ed. Global Economic Competitiveness. Boston: Chantal Publishing, pp. 27-56. ISBN 978-80 216-1234-0.
  24. [23] JONES, P. M. and J. MARTIN, 2021. Increasing the reproducibility of research will reduce the problem of apophenia (and more). Can J Anesth, 68, 1120-1134. ISSN 1496-8975. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  25. [24] JONES, R. J., 2001. The politics and economics of the European Union: an introductory text. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 1-84064-110-X.
  26. [25] KAHNEMAN, D., 2012. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books Publishing. ISBN 978-0-14-103357-0.
  27. [26] KHARE, A., L. I. LABRECQUE and A. K. ASARE, 2011. The assimilative and contrastive effects of word-of-mouth volume: an experimental examination of online consumer ratings. Journal of Retailing, 87(1), 111-126. ISSN 0022-4359. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  28. [27] KIM, H.-S., P. BRUBAKER and K. SEO, 2015. Examining psychological effects of source cues and social plugins on a product review website. Computers in Human Behavior, 49(1), 74-85. ISSN 0747-5632 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  29. [28] KIM, J. M. and K. HWANG, 2020. Roles of emotional expressions in review consumption and generation processes. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102454. ISSN 0278-4319. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  30. [29] KIM, J. and A. GAMBINO, 2016. Do we trust the crowd or information system? Effects of personalization and bandwagon cues on users' attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a restaurant recommendation website. Computers in Human Behavior, 65(1), 369-379. ISSN 0747-5632 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  31. [30] KREIMER, R., 2016. The Impact of Authority Figures in our Beliefs Experimental Studies on the "Author's Bias". Journal of Humanities Therapy, 7(2), 1-16. ISSN 2233-7563.
  32. [31] KURIEN, R., A. R. PAILA and A. NAGENDRA, 2014. Application of Paralysis Analysis Syndrome in Customer Decision Making. Procedia Economics and Finance, Shaping the Future of Business and Society 11(1), 323-334. ISSN 2212-5671 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  33. [32] LANKES, R. D., 2008. Credibility on the internet: Shifting from authority to reliability. Journal of Documentation, 64(5), 667-686. ISSN 0022-0418. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  34. [33] LIU, Y. and R. DU, 2020. Examining the Effect of Reviewer Socioeconomic Status Disclosure on Customers' Purchase Intention. Journal of Global Information Management, 28(3), 17-35. ISSN 1062-7375. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  35. [34] MALIK, M. S. I. and A. HUSSAIN, 2017. Helpfulness of product reviews as a function of discrete positive and negative emotions. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 290-302. ISSN 0747-5632. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  36. [35] MARSHALL, J. A. R., P. C. TRIMMER, A. I. HOUSTON and J. M. MCNAMARA, 2013. On evolutionary explanations of cognitive biases. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 469-473. ISSN 0169-5347. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  37. [36] MUCHNIK, L., S. ARAL and S. J. TAYLOR, 2013. Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment. Science, 341(6146), 647-651. ISSN 0036-8075. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  38. [37] NGO-YE, T. L. and A. P. SINHA, 2014. The influence of reviewer engagement characteristics on online review helpfulness: A text regression model. Decision Support Systems, 61, 47-58. ISSN 0167-9236. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  39. [38] SEAMAN, V., 1999. Economic Transition. Journal of Small Economies in Transition, 47(6), 797-810. ISSN 0098-3237.
  40. [39] SUNDAR, S. S., A. OELDORF-HIRSCH and Q. XU, 2008. The bandwagon effect of collaborative filtering technology. In CHI´08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 3456-3458. ISBN 978-1-60558-012-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  41. [40] SHI, Z., C. ZHANG and L. AWU, 2020.Sales or reviews, which matters more to consumer preference and online advertising? evidence from eye-tracking and self-reporting, International Journal of Advertising, 39(8), 1274-1300. ISSN 1759-3948Y Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  42. [41] VOSOUGHI, S., D. ROY and S. ARAL, 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. ISSN 0036-8075. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  43. [42] WORTH, T., 2009. Too many choices can tax the brain, research shows. Los Angeles Times. Accessible from: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2009-mar-16-he-choices16-story.html
  44. [43] WU, T. Y. and C. A. LIN, 2017. Predicting the effects of eWOM and online brand messaging: Source trust, bandwagon effect and innovation adoption factors. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 470-480. ISSN 0736-5853. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  45. [44] XU, Q., M. SCHMIERBACH, S. BELLUR, E. ASH, A. OELDORF-HIRSCH and A. KEGERISE, 2012. The effects of "friend" characteristics on evaluations of an activist group in a social networking context. Mass Communication and Society, 15(3), 432-453. ISSN 1520-5436. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  46. [45] XU, Q. (2014). Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 33(1), 136-144. ISSN 0747-5632 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  47. [46] YANG, L. and H. R. UNNAVA, 2016. Ambivalence, Selective Exposure, and Negativity Effect. Psychology & Marketing, 33(5), 331-343. ISSN 1520-6793. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  48. [47] YOU, Y., G. GAUTHAM and A. M. JOSHI, 2015. A Meta-Analysis of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Elasticity. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 19-39. ISSN 0022-2429 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...