Acta academica karviniensia 2017, 17(3):5-17 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2017.018
ASSESSMENT OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE CULTURE SECTOR IN THE EU COUNTRIES
- V©B - Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Economics, Sokolská 33, 702 00 Ostrava, Email:eva.ardielli@vsb.cz
The culture sector is from the European or national perspective often designated as a dynamic segment of the economy, which is also characterized by high rates of GDP growth. This fact reinforces the importance of the sector within the European Union, as GDP growth belongs among the primary goals of the Community, in accordance with European legislation and key EU documents. However, from the socio-economic perspective the benefits of culture sector are economically difficult to quantify. The paper is focused on the problems the culture sector assessment from the point of view of socio-economic importance in the international context of the European Union. The research is based on the usage of MCDM methods (TOPSIS and WSA). The results are focused on the comparison of the socio-economic importance of the culture sector in EU member countries. For the assessment are chosen 7 socio-economic culture indicators describing the importance of culture sector in the country. The results of two selected MCDM methods are verified on the basis of correlation analysis.
Keywords: assessment, culture sector, European Union, MCDM methods, socio-economic importance
JEL classification: H11, H41, Z18
Received: April 29, 2017; Accepted: September 20, 2017; Published: September 30, 2017 Show citation
References
- BADIA, F. and E. BORIN, 2012. Opportunities and Critical Points for the Introduction of Performance Measurement Systems in Theatres - A Comparison between Theoretical Assumptions and Empirical Realities. Journal of Cultural Management and Policy. 2(2), 45-59. ISSN 2224-2554.
Go to original source...
- CAI, Z. and Y. WANG, 2012. Research Frontiers in Public Sector Performance Measurement. Physics Procedia. 2012, 25, 793-799. ISSN 1875-3892.
Go to original source...
- CHADWICK, A., 2016. Why culture is important pillar for socioeconomic development in Saudi Arabia. [online]. 2016 [cit. 2017-02-02]. Available: http://www.arabnews.com/node/993991/columns
- CHEN, S. J. and C. L. HWANG, 1992. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-54998-7.
Go to original source...
- CHIARAVALLOTI, F., 2014. Performance Evaluation in the Arts and Cultural Sector: A Story of Accounting at Its Margins. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 44(2), 61-89. ISSN 1063-2921.
Go to original source...
- COLOMBO, A., 2006. Cultural Economy. The economic impact of the cultural sector from a European perspective. Digithum, 8, 3-9. ISSN 1575-2275.
Go to original source...
- CRAIK, J., 2005. Dilemmas in Policy Support for the Arts and Cultural Sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 64, 6-19. ISSN 1467-8500.
Go to original source...
- DINCER, S. E., 2011. Multi-Criteria Analysis of Economic Activity for European Union Member States and Candidate Countries: TOPSIS and WSA Applications. European Journal of Social Sciences. 21(4), 563-572. ISSN 1450-2267.
- EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK, 2003. Public sector efficiency: an international comparison. [online]. 2003 [cit. 2017-03-03]. Available: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp242.pdf?97d51e6d2cca0da4180e5c215dcccd8e.
- EUROPA, 2017. Supporting Europe's cultural and creative sectors. [online]. 2017 [cit. 2017-03-03]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/culture/policy_en.
- EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2006. The Economy of Culture in Europe. [online]. 2006 [cit. 2017-02-24]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/culture/library/studies/cultural-economy_en.pdf.
- EUROSTAT, 2016. Culture. [online]. 2016 [cit. 2017-02-15]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/culture/overview.
- FIALA, P., 2008. Modely a metody rozhodování. Praha: Oeconomica. ISBN978-80-245-1981-4.
- KAPLAN, R. S., and D. P. NORTON, 2001. Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part I. Accounting Horizons. 15(1), 87-104. ISSN 0888-7993.
Go to original source...
- KARADAYI, M. A. and E. E.KARSAK, 2014. Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Health-Care Performance Assessment in Istanbul. In Proceedings of The 18th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. Orlando, 228-233. ISBN 9781941763049.
- KEYVAN-EKBATANI, M. and O. CATS, 2015. Multi-Criteria Appraisal of Multi-Modal Urban Public Transport Systems. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 1-11. ISSN 2352-1465.
- KLAMER, A., L. PETROVA and A. MIGNOSA, 2006. Financing the Arts and Culture in the European Union. [online]. 2006 [cit. 2017-03-24]. Available: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2006/375309/IPOL-CULT_ET%282006%29375309_EN.pdf.
- LAURENT, R., 2014. The cultural industries in France and Europe: Points of Reference and Comparison. Culture chiffres, 7, 1-20, [online]. 2014 [cit. 2017-03-24]. Available:http://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_CULC_147_0001-the-cultural-industries-in-france-and.htm.
Go to original source...
- MIHAIU, D., 2014. Measuring Performance In The Public Sector: Between Necessity And Difficulty. Studies in Business and Economics. 9(2), 40-50. ISSN 1842-4120.
- MKSR, 2013. Stratégia rozvoja kreatívneho priemyslu v Slovenskej republike. [online]. 2013 [cit. 2017-03-04]. Available: http://www.culture.gov.sk/posobnost-ministerstva/kreativny-priemysel-165.html.
- OECD, 2006. International Measurement of the Economic and Social Importance of Culture. [online]. 2006 [cit. 2017-03-05]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/std/na/37257281.pdf.
- SHIH, H., H. SHYUR and E. S. LEE, 2007. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 45, 801-813. ISSN 0895-7177.
Go to original source...
- SHAOUT, A. and M. K. YOUSIF, 2014. Performance Evaluation - Methods and Techniques Survey. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology. 3(5), 966 - 979. ISSN 2078-5828.
- THROSBY, D., 2004. Assessing the impacts of a cultural industry. Journal of Arts Management, Law Society, 34(3), 188-204. ISSN 1063-2921.
Go to original source...
- TURBIDE, J. and C. LAURIN, 2009. Performance Measurement in the Arts Sector: The Case of the Performing Arts. International Journal of Arts Management. 11(2), 56-70. ISSN 1480-8986.
- UNESCO, 2009. Measuring the economic contribution of cultural industries. A review and assessment of current methodological approaches. [online]. 2009 [cit. 2017-03-02]. Available: http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/measuring-the-economic-contribution-of-cultural-industries-a-review-and-assessment-of-current-methodological-approaches-en_1.pdf.
- VAN DER POL, H., 2008. Key role of cultural and creative industries in the economy. In Statistics, Knowledge and Policy, 2007: Measuring and Fostering the Progress of Societies. Paris and Washington, D.C: OECD. 343-353.
- VAN DE VALLE, S., 2008. Comparing the performance of national public sectors: conceptual problems. Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 57(4), 329-338. ISSN 1741-0401.
Go to original source...
- WANG, S. et al., 2016. Using DEA Models to Measure the Performance of Public Culture Services in China. In Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), Las Vegas, 1-10, ISBN 9781479930104.
Go to original source...
- WORLD BANK, 2016. Worldwide Governance Indicators. [online]. 2016 [cit. 2017-02-02]. Available: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home
- ZEDKOVÁ, A., 2016. Possibilities of dynamization of cultural tourism products. Acta academica karviniensia, 3, 62-73. ISSN 1212-415X.
Go to original source...