Acta academica karviniensia 2020, 20(1):18-30 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2020.002
GENERATIONAL SHIFT IN WELLBEING PRIORITIES UNDERSTANDING
- Vysoká škola báňská-Technická univerzita Ostrava, Ekonomická fakulta, Sokolská tř. 33, 701 21 Ostrava
The subject of this research is wellbeing. This area is still quite neglected in the Czech Republic. A research objective has been set: to determine whether the first generation is feeling a lower level of wellbeing than the emerging generation, as presented by the U-shape. Research questions have been formulated: Are there differences in the evaluation of wellbeing in two generations? If they exist, in which criteria are the differences significant? Data from 3,000 respondents from two generations were obtained for the research. The significance of the wellbeing elements was evaluated using the network process analytical method. In young respondents, thriving wellbeing is identified, as opposed to older respondents, where the struggling wellbeing type is identified. In this way, researches on the occurrence of U-shape in this area are only partially confirmed. Young people prefer the financial aspect, health and social relationships are more important for the elderly. The article emphasizes that knowledge of the level of wellbeing is important both from the point of view of the individual and the whole of society.
Keywords: analytic network process, generation, U-shape, wellbeing.
JEL classification: I31, M50
Received: October 21, 2020; Revised: October 31, 2020; Accepted: December 16, 2020; Published: December 17, 2020 Show citation
References
- ARGYLE, M., 2003. Causes and correlates of happiness. In: D. KAHNEMAN, E. DIENER and N. SCHWARZ, eds. Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage, p. 307-322:353-373. ISBN 78-0871544230.
- BAUMEISTER, R. F., K. D. VOHS and D. M. TICE, 2007. The Strength Model of Self-Control. Current Directions in Psychological Science [online]. 16, 351-355 [vid. 5. června 2020]. ISSN 1467-8721. Dostupné z: doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x.
Go to original source...
- BLATNÝ, M., K. MILLOVÁ, M. JELÍNEK a T. OSECKÁ, 2010. Životní smysluplnost: osobnostní souvislosti a antecedenty. Československá psychologie. 54(3), 225-234. ISSN 0009-062x.
- CVVM, 2019. Příznivé hodnocení ekonomické situace zůstalo na maximu [on-line]. [vid. 4. dubna 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.investicniweb.cz/news-cvvm-priznive-hodnoceni-ekonomicke-situace-zustalo-na-maximu/.
- CUMMINS, R., 2010. Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies [online]. 11, 1-17 [vid. 9. června 2020]. ISSN 1573-7780. Dostupné z: doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0.
Go to original source...
- GALAMBOS, N. L., H. J. KRAHN, M. D. JOHNSON and M. E. LACHMAN, 2020. The U Shape of Happiness Across the Life Course: Expanding the Discussion. Perspectives on Psychological Science [online]. 15(4), 898-912 [vid. 9. června 2020]. ISSN 1745-6916. Dostupné z: doi:10.1177/1745691620902428.
Go to original source...
- CHENG, T. C., N. POWDTHAVEE and A. J. OSWALD, 2017. Longitudinal Evidence for a Midlife Nadir in Human Well-Being: Results from Four Data Sets. Economic Journal [online]. 127(599), 126-142 [vid. 7. května 2020]. ISSN 0013-0133. Dostupné z: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoh&an=1635458≻ope=site.
Go to original source...
- JAISRI, M., 2016. Happiness and satisfaction with life among adults. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology [online]. 7(1), 84-87 [vid. 9. června 2020]. ISSN 2229-4937. Dostupné z: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&an=115135334≻ope=site
- OECD, 2013. Guidelines on measuring subjective wellbeing [online]. [vid. 8. května 2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.oecd.org/statistics/Guidelines%20on%20Measuring%20Subjective%20Well-being.pdf
- PROTHEA, 2014. Co je wellbeing? [on-line]. [vid. 7. května 2020]. Dostupné z: http://prothea.cz/blog/co-je-wellbeing/.
- QUICK, A., 2018. Measuring wellbeing inequality. What are the appropriate indicators of wellbeing inequality? [online]. [vid. 7. května 2020]. Dostupné z: https://neweconomics.org/2018/05/measuring-wellbeing-inequality
- SAATY, T. L. and L. G. VARGAS, 2012. Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2nd ed. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-1-4613-5667-7.
- UCHIDA, Y. and S. OISHI, 2016. The Happiness of Individuals and the Collective. Japanese Psychological Research [online]. 58(1), 125-141 [vid. 5. června 2020]. ISSN 1468-5884. Dostupné z: doi: 10.1111/jpr.12103
Go to original source...
- WEINBERG, M. K., C. SETON, and N. CAMERON, 2018. The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index-Adult. Journal of Happiness Studies [online]. 19, 315-332 [vid. 5. června 2020]. ISBN 1573-7780. Dostupné z: doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1.
Go to original source...
- WEISS, A., J. E. KING, M. INOUE-MURAYAMA, T. MATSUZAWA and A. J. OSWALD, 2012. Evidence for a midlife crisis in great apes consistent with the U-shape in human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America [online]. 109(49), 19949-19952 [vid. 5. června 2020]. ISSN 0027-8424. Dostupné z: doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212592109
Go to original source...