Acta academica karviniensia 2020, 20(1):47-57 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2020.004

ADJUSTING OF THE WEIGHTING SCHEME USING PENALTY METHODS IN THE BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEYS

Veronika Ptáčková, Jiří Novák, Lubomír Štěpánek
Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics

The Business and Consumer Survey is a commonly used and easy-to-follow tool for describing the current and near-future situation in the national economy. A lot of countries use leading indicators for economic predictions. The computations of the indicators are generally based on weighting schemes considering the importance of each survey questions groups. The European Commission harmonizes the weighting schemes for those calculations.In this article, we adjust the weighting scheme of the Economic Sentiment Indicator as the main result of the Business and Consumer Survey and design a new weighting structure of the calculation.  To find a new weighting scheme, we use a combination of a penalty method which measures L3-based-norm distance between all original weights and the proposed ones, adapting the weight system to the Czech economic data.  Applying the penalty functions is a method of respecting the original, empirically estimated weights used for the indicator's calculations on a long-term basis. The modified weighting scheme for the Economic Sentiment Indicator construction is supposed to ensure better predictions and, eventually, provide early warnings about any unexpected changes in the business cycle in the national economy.

Keywords: business and consumer survey, optimization, prediction ability, weighting scheme.
JEL classification: C10, C22

Received: October 2, 2020; Revised: December 4, 2020; Accepted: December 16, 2020; Published: December 17, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ptáčková V, Novák J, Štěpánek L. ADJUSTING OF THE WEIGHTING SCHEME USING PENALTY METHODS IN THE BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEYS. Acta academica karviniensia. 2020;20(1):47-57. doi: 10.25142/aak.2020.004.
Download citation

References

  1. ANCUSA, V., R. BOGDAN and O. CAUS, 2015, June. A Complex Network-Based Visual Analysis of Business Tendency and Consumer Opinion Surveys. In ECRM2015-Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Research Methods 2015: ECRM 2015 (p. 10). Academic Conferences Limited.
  2. BRAND D. A., M. SAISANA, L. A. RYNN, F. PENNONI and A. B. LOWENFELS, 2007. Comparative Analysis of Alcohol Control Policies in 30 Countries, PLoS Medicine, 0759 April 2007, Vol. 4, 4, e151:0752-0759, www.plosmedicine.org Go to original source...
  3. CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE, 2020. Business cycle surveys. Available at: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/business_cycle_surveys
  4. DIBIASI, A., K. ABBERGER, M. SIEGENTHALER and J. E. STURM, 2018. The effects of policy uncertainty on investment: Evidence from the unexpected acceptance of a far-reaching referendum in Switzerland. European Economic Review, 104, pp. 38-67. Go to original source...
  5. EMERSON, R. A. and D. F. HENDRY, 1996. An evaluation of forecasting using leading indicators. Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), pp. 271-291 Go to original source...
  6. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2020. User guide. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/bcs_user_guide_en_0.pdf 
  7. EUROSTAT, 2020. Glossary: Leading indicator. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Leading_indicator
  8. GOGGIN, J., 2008. An analysis of the potential of the European Commission business and consumer surveys for macroeconomic forecasting. Quarterly Economic Commentary: Special Articles, 2008(4-Winter), pp. 46-67.
  9. HÖLZL, W., S. KANIOVSKI and Y. KANIOVSKI, 2019. Exploring the dynamics of business survey data using Markov models. Computational Management Science, 16(4), 621-649. Go to original source...
  10. KAUFMANN, D. and R. SCHEUFELE, 2017. Business tendency surveys and macroeconomic fluctuations. International Journal of Forecasting, 33(4), 878-893. Go to original source...
  11. LEHMANN, R., 2020. Forecasting exports across Europe: What are the superior survey indicators?. Empirical Economics, 1-25. Go to original source...
  12. KEARNEY, I., 1991. A Preliminary Analysis of the CII/ESRI Business Survey Data. ESRI, mimeo.
  13. MEĻIHOVS, A. and S. RUSAKOVA, 2005. Short-Term Forecasting of Economic Development in Latvia Using Business and Consumer Survey Data (No. 2005/04). Latvijas Banka.
  14. OECD, European Commission, 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and user guide. Available: https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf
  15. PTÁČKOVÁ, V., L. ŠTĚPÁNEK and V. HANZAL. Business and Consumer Surveys: the Weighting Scheme. In Löster, T., Pavelka, T. (ed.). International Days of Statistics and Economics 2019. Slaný: Melandrium, Libuše Macáková, 2019, s. 1234 - 1243. ISBN 978-80-87990-18-6. URL: https://msed.vse.cz/msed_2019/article/182-Ptackova-Veronika-paper.pdf
  16. R CORE TEAM, 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org.
  17. SAISANA, M. and S. TARANTOLA, 2002. State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development, EUR 20408 EN, European Commission-JRC: Italy.
  18. SAMMUT, C. and G. I. WEBB, 2011. Mean Squared Error. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_528 Go to original source...
  19. SHARMA, A. K., 2005. Text Book of Correlations and Regression. Discovery Publishing Pvt. Ltd. ISBN: 8171419356