Acta academica karviniensia 2013, 13(2):62-72 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2013.026

INTERNAL FACTORS WHICH DETERMINE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO OWNERSHIP CONCENTRATION

Chandrapala Pathirawasam
University of Kelaniya, Faculty of Commerce and Management Studies, Dalugama, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, Email:Pathi3@yahoo.com

The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of ownership concentration and other firm specific factors on company financial performance of 102 listed companies at Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE) over a two-year period from 2008 to 2009. The data are gathered through annual reports of respective companies. Both pooled and ordinary least square (OLS) regressions are used to analyze the data. Using ROA as the dependent variable, it is revealed that ownership concentration does not have a significant positive relationship with ROA. However, firm size, quick ratio and inventory having positive impact on ROA. But the debt ratio negatively relate with financial performance. The overall explanatory power of the model is below average and further research is necessary to increase the statistical power of the model.

Keywords: Colombo Stock Exchange, financial performance, ownership concentration, returns on assets
JEL classification: L25, M41

Received: November 8, 2010; Accepted: April 16, 2013; Published: June 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pathirawasam C. INTERNAL FACTORS WHICH DETERMINE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO OWNERSHIP CONCENTRATION. Acta academica karviniensia. 2013;13(2):62-72. doi: 10.25142/aak.2013.026.
Download citation

References

  1. BARBOSA, N. and H. LOURI, 2005. Corporate Performance: does ownership matter? A comparison of foreign-and domestic-owned firms in Greece and Portugal. Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 27, p. 73-102. ISSN: 1573-7160. Go to original source...
  2. BRIGHAM, E. F. and J. F. HOUSTON, (2004)10th edition. Fundamentals of Financial Management, Thomson South-Western. ISBN 0-324-178298.
  3. BROWN, S., L. KIN and T. LYS, 1999. Use of R<sup>2</sup> in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance over the Last four Decades,' Journal of Accounting & Economics, (Vol. 28, no.2, p. 83-115. ISSN:0165-4101 Go to original source...
  4. CHHIBBER, P. K. and S. K. MAJUMDAR, 1999. Foreign ownership and profitability: property rights, control and the performance of firms in Indian Industry. Journal of Law and Economics, vol.46, no.3, p.209-238. ISSN: 00222186. Go to original source...
  5. CUBBIN, J. and P. A. GEROSKI, 1987. The Convergence of Profits in the Long Run: Inter firm and Inter-industry Comparisons, Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.35, p. 427-442. ISSN:1467-6451 Go to original source...
  6. DEMSETZ, H., 1983. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, vol.26, no.2. p.375-394. ISSN: 00222186. Go to original source...
  7. DEMSETZ, H. and K. LEHN, 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 93, no.6. p. 1155-1177. ISSN: 0022-3808. Go to original source...
  8. DJANKOV, S. and B. HOEKMAN, 2000. Foreign Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises. The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 14, no.1, p.49-64. ISSN: 0258-6770. Go to original source...
  9. GERSON, J. and G. BARR, 1996. The structure of corporate control and ownership in a regulatory environment unbiased toward one-share-one-vote. Corporate Governance, vol. 4. no.2, p.78-93. ISSN: 1467-8683. Go to original source...
  10. HANSMANN, H., 1988. Ownership of the firm. Journal of Law. Economics and Organization, vol.4, no.2, p.267-305. ISSN 0354 - 4699.
  11. HANSE, G.S. and B. WERNERFELT, 1989. Determinants of Firm performance: the relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic management Journal, vol. 10, p.399-411. ISSN: 1097-0266. Go to original source...
  12. HARN, K. and E. DENIZ, 2008. Firm-specific capabilities and foreign direct investment activities of Turkish manufacturing firms. Journal of management Development, vol. 27, no. 7, p. 761-777. ISSN: 0262-1711. Go to original source...
  13. KUNTLURU, S., V. R. MUPPANI and M. A. ALI KHAN, 2008. Financial performance of foreign and domestic owned companies in India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, vol. 9, no.1, p.28-54. ISSN: 1528-6940. Go to original source...
  14. LENG, A., 2004. A.C. The Impact of Corporate Governance Practices on Firms' Financial Performance. Evidence from Malaysian Companies. SEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 308-18. Go to original source...
  15. LLOYD, W. P., J. H. HAND and N. K. MODANI, 1998. The effect of the degree of ownership control on firm diversification, market value, and merger activity. Journal of Business Research, vol. 15, no.4, p. 303-312. ISSN: 0148-2963. Go to original source...
  16. MAHMOOD, MO A. and J. M. GARY, 1993. Measuring Technological Impact of Information Technology investment: An Exploratory study. Journal of Management Information systems, vol. 10, no.1, p.97-122. ISSN: 0742-1222. Go to original source...
  17. RUMELT, R. P., 1991. How Much Does Industry Matter?'. Strategic Management Journal, vol.12, no.3, p. 167-185. ISSN: 1097-0266. Go to original source...
  18. THOMSEN, S. and T. PEDERSEN, 2000. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European Companies. Strategic Management Journal, vol.21, p. 689-705. ISSN: 1097-0266. Go to original source...