Acta academica karviniensia 2013, 13(3):78-83 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2013.044

COURTESY IN THE COMMUNICATION SPACE OF THE STUDY INFORMATION SYSTEM

Pavla Chejnová
Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta, M. D. Rettigové 4, 116 39 Praha 1, Email:pavla.chejnova@pedf.cuni.cz

In the article are analysed discussion sequences from internet forum of Faculty of Education, Charles University, Prague, which are oriented at solving problems with students'agenda, mainly enrolling students in the classes. There are described the politeness strategies chosen by students to fulfill their communicative objectives when they contact members of schedule planning committee. The students'utterances have features of oral speech and the communication is less formal than it is expected in institutional setting. There are transformations in pragmatic factors, e.g. smaller distance towards authorities and less asymmetry between interactants.

Keywords: communication on the internet, politeness formulae, politeness strategy, written and oral form of communication
JEL classification: Y8

Received: June 5, 2012; Accepted: June 19, 2013; Published: September 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chejnová P. COURTESY IN THE COMMUNICATION SPACE OF THE STUDY INFORMATION SYSTEM. Acta academica karviniensia. 2013;13(3):78-83. doi: 10.25142/aak.2013.044.
Download citation

References

  1. BROWN, P. and S. LEVINSON, 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  2. FREDSTED, E., 2005. Politeness in Denmark: Getting to the Point. In Hickey, L.; Stewart, M. (eds.) Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, s. 159-173. Go to original source...
  3. GREPL, M. a P. KARLÍK, 1998. Skladba češtiny. Olomouc: Votobia.
  4. HOFSTEDE, G., 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  5. HOFSTEDE, G., 1999. Kultury a organizace. Software lidské mysli. Spolupráce mezi kulturami a její důležitost pro přežití. Praha: UK.
  6. HOFSTEDE, G., J. HOFSTEDE and M. MINKOV, 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  7. LAKOFF, R., 2005. Civility and its discontents Or, getting in your face. In Lakoff, R.; Ide S.(eds.) Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing, s. 23-43. Go to original source...
  8. LEECH, G., 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. Oxford: Longman.
  9. NEKVAPIL, J. a J. V. NEUSTUPNÝ, 2005. Politeness in the Czech Republic: Distance, Levels of Expressions, Management and Intercultural Contact. In Hickey, L.; Stewart, M. (eds.) Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, s. 247-262. Go to original source...
  10. NEUSTUPNÝ, J. V. a J. NEKVAPIL, 2003. Language Management in the Czech Republic. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4, s. 181-366. Go to original source...
  11. PRŮCHA, J., 2010. Interkulturní komunikace. Praha: Grada.
  12. ŠMEJKALOVÁ, M a L. JANOVEC. Jste zlatíčko aneb Kterak odchytit Daňka. Zdvořilost v soudobé studentské e-mailové komunikaci. Český jazyk a literatura, 62, 2011/2012, s. 61-67. Go to original source...