Acta academica karviniensia 2019, 19(1):71-83 | DOI: 10.25142/aak.2019.006

DECISION MAKING ON CAPITAL MARKETS USING NON-NUMERICAL MODEL BASED ON QUALITATIVE TRENDS

Tomáš Poláček, Tomáš Meluzín, Libor Chládek
Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management, Kolejní 4, 612 00 Brno

One of the main objectives of this study is to develop a qualitative model that will serve the decision makers' CFOs (chief financial officers), where, as a rule, it is decided without deeper processing of information many factors that affect each other significantly. Lack of appropriate statistical information in connection with turbulently changing environments suggests that further research is needed to extend existing IPO models based on statistical analyzes. The paper is using basic qualitative research of trends. A qualitative trend model can be developed under conditions when the relevant quantitative model must be heavily simplified. The key information input into IPO is expert knowledge.  The solution of a trend model M(X) is a set S of scenarios where X is the set of n variables quantified by the trends. All possible transitions among the scenarios S are generated. An oriented transitional graph G has as nodes the set of scenarios S and as arcs the transitions T. An oriented G path describes any possible future and past time behaviour of the IPO system under study. The case study presents a model based on integration of equationless relations using 8 variables e.g. Market condition, Recognisability or Liquidity risk.  There are 17 scenarios S and 41 transitions T among them. All pairs of relationships are based on trends, either increasing, constant, or decreasing. The key input of the correct IPO timing analysis is based on the knowledge of experts traced from qualitative heuristics. The transition graph is a qualitative interpretation of all possible quantitative time series of all variables used in our IPO timetable and should be used as an effective tool to support CFO decisions.

Keywords: bankruptcy, capital markets, forecast, IPO, qualitative, transition, trend.
JEL classification: G17, G32

Received: October 5, 2018; Revised: November 26, 2018; Accepted: March 6, 2019; Published: March 19, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Poláček T, Meluzín T, Chládek L. DECISION MAKING ON CAPITAL MARKETS USING NON-NUMERICAL MODEL BASED ON QUALITATIVE TRENDS. Acta academica karviniensia. 2019;19(1):71-83. doi: 10.25142/aak.2019.006.
Download citation

References

  1. BREDEWEG, B. and P. SALLES, 2009. Qualitative models of ecological systems - Editorial introduction. Ecol. Inform., Special Issue: Qualitative models of ecological systems 4, 261-262. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2009.10.001 Go to original source...
  2. TAJUDDIN, A. H. et al., 2017. The Effect of Institutional Investors on Oversubscription in the Malaysian IPOs. Market International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, ISSN 2250-057X, Volume 07 Issue 08, Page 45-50
  3. BASCHIERI, G., A. CAROSI and S. MENGOLI, 2017. Initial Public Offerings and the Firm Location. Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia Working Paper No. 2016/13. Go to original source...
  4. BEATTY, R. P. and J. R. RITTER, 1986. Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1), 213-232. Go to original source...
  5. BOČKOVÁ, N., Z. BROŽ and M. DOHNAL, 2012. Fuzzy model of relationship among economic performance, competitiveness and business ethic of small and medium - sized enterprises. Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, roč. 2012, č. 4, s. 71-78. ISSN: 1211-8516. Go to original source...
  6. BOYER, D., 2011. Energopolitics and the Anthropology of Energy. Anthropology News [online]., 52(5), 5-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-3502.2011.52505.x. ISSN 15416151. Go to original source...
  7. DELIS, M. D. and N. MYLONIDIS, 2015. Trust, happiness, and households' financial decisions. Journal of Financial Stability [online]., 20, 82-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfs.2015.08.002. ISSN 15723089. Go to original source...
  8. DOČEKALOVÁ, M. and A. KOCMANOVÁ, 2016. Composite indicator for measuring corporate sustainability. Ecological Indicators[online]. 61, 612-623. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.012. Go to original source...
  9. DOHNAL, M., 1985. Applications of a universal expert system in industry. Comput. Ind. 6, 115-121. doi:10.1016/0166-3615(85)90017-X Go to original source...
  10. ECKBO, B. and E. NORLI, Liquidity risk, leverage and long-run IPO returns. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2005, 11(1-2), 1-35 [cit. 2018-12-03]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.02.002. ISSN 09291199. Go to original source...
  11. FORBUS, K. D., (1984). Qualitative Reasoning About Physical Systems, Qualitative Process Theory 85-168. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-87670-6.50006-6 Go to original source...
  12. CHOUEIRY, B.Y., Y. IWASAKI and S. McILRAITH, 2005. Towards a practical theory of reformulation for reasoning about physical systems. Artif. Intell., Reformulation 162, 145-204. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2004.01.004. Go to original source...
  13. KAMSTR, M. and P. KENNEDY, 1998, Combining qualitative forecasts using logit, International Journal of Forecasting 14 83-93 Go to original source...
  14. LIANG, CH. and R. YANG, 2012. IPO's Contagion Effect and Competition Effect. Fifth International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering [online]. IEEE, s. 252-256. DOI: 10.1109/BIFE.2012.61. ISBN 978-1-4673-2092-4. Go to original source...
  15. LIPMANN, O. and H. BOGEN, 1996. Naive Physik. Arbeiten aus dem Instuut fur angewandte Psychologie in Berlin. Theoretische und experimentele Untersuchungen fuer die Feihigkeit zu intelligentem Handeln (Leipzig, Johann Ambrosius Barth)
  16. MELUZÍN, T., M. ZINECKER and N. LACE, 2016. Going Public: Key Factors to Consider by IPO Candidates on Emerging Markets of Poland and the Czech Republic. Engineering Economics, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 392-404. ISSN 1392-2785. Go to original source...
  17. MUKESH, B., H. CHEN and C. MAZUMDAR, 2008, Competition in IPO underwriting: Time series evidence, in Andrew H. Chen (ed.) Research in Finance, Volume 24. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.1 - 25
  18. ORRELL, D. and P. McSHARRY, 2009. System economics: Overcoming the pitfalls of forecasting models via a multidisciplinary approach. Int. J. Forecast., Special section: Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability 25, 734-743. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.05.002 Go to original source...
  19. POLÁČEK, T. and M. DOHNAL, 2018. Qualitative Models of Bankruptcy Proceedings using Multi- Expert Complex Decision Making. PERSPECTIVES OF BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, DEVELOPMENT IN DIGITAL AGE. 2017. s. 54-55. ISBN: 978-80-214-5531- 3.
  20. RADU, M., 2015. The Impact of Political Determinants on Economic Growth in CEE Countries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences[online]. 197, 1990-1996. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.579. ISSN 18770428. Go to original source...
  21. SEN, P. K. and J. M. SINGER, 1994. Large Sample Methods in Statistics: An Introduction with Applications. CRC Press. Go to original source...
  22. STEKLER, H. and H. HILARY SYMINGTON, 2016. Evaluating qualitative forecasts: The FOMC minutes, 2006-2010, International Journal of Forecasting, 32, 559-570 Go to original source...
  23. TOWNSEND, T., 2008, Mathematical psychology: Prospects for the 21st century: A guest editorial, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 52, pp 269-280 Go to original source...
  24. VÍCHA, T. and M. DOHNAL, 2008. Qualitative identification of chaotic systems behaviours. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals [online]., 38(1), 70-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2008.01.027. ISSN 09600779. Go to original source...